Change Management Tips

A mentee recently asked for guidance on managing resistance to change, which inspired me to share a few tips with y’all.

Sep 04, 2024

In my roles leading quality engineering, a big part of my job has been driving change. Whether it’s tweaking how we report bugs, revamping development processes, or rethinking how we handle incidents and post-mortems, I’ve seen firsthand how people react – and resist. And one thing I've learned? Change doesn’t always come easy.

Change can feel like a big, scary monster – especially when you’re leading a team through it. Resistance can feel almost ingrained, but it doesn’t have to be a roadblock. I’ve also seen how, with the right approach, resistance can soften, and real progress can happen.

I hope the tips in this article help you navigate the challenge of change management and keep moving forward.

The Challenge of Change Management

Change management can be complex, especially in large organizations. One of the biggest challenges is often resistance to change, which can stem from various psychological, emotional, or practical concerns.

Photo of blocks that spell out CHANGE. — Photo by Nothing Ahead, Pexels.

Here are some common reasons for resistance:

Fear of the Unknown: Change often brings uncertainty, and people may fear what they don’t understand or can’t predict. This fear can stem from a lack of information or experience with the new situation.

Comfort with the Status Quo: Many people resist change simply because they are comfortable with the way things are, even if the current situation isn’t ideal. You may hear a lot of "We've always done it this way," which is a mindset that can hinder progress.

Fear of Losing Status or Influence: People may resist change if they feel their status or influence may be diminished. Is someone losing headcount on their team or within their department? Are responsibilities shifting?

Concerns About Competence: Employees may be concerned that they won’t have the skills, knowledge, or ability to succeed in a new environment or with new processes. This fear can cause resistance.

Attachment to Current Processes or Beliefs: People may have strong emotional attachments to existing ways of doing things or certain beliefs. They may see change as a challenge to their personal or professional identity. Anyone involved in the original decision-making process may be more resistant than others since their prior decision is being overturned.

Poor Communication: When the reasons for change are not communicated clearly, or the benefits are not effectively articulated, people may resist due to confusion or a lack of understanding.

Past Experiences with Failed Changes: If past changes have failed, folks may be skeptical or resistant to new change efforts.

Misalignment with Personal Goals or Values: Changes that conflict with personal or professional values, goals, or career aspirations may cause resistance. For example, a subject matter expert on ABC may resist changing from ABC to XYZ.

Change Fatigue: A team that has gone through several rounds of restructuring and/or process changes in a short period may resist further changes due to exhaustion.

Belief That the Change Is Unnecessary: If people don’t see the need for change or believe the current state is adequate, they may resist. They might view the change as a waste of time or resources.

Fear of Failure or Making Mistakes: Change often involves learning new skills, processes, or tools, which can lead to mistakes or failure. People may resist change to avoid the risk of failing or being judged.

Overcoming Resistance

Overcoming resistance requires creating a space where people can be comfortable with ambiguity and open to new ideas. It also involves setting clear expectations and communicating the reasons behind the changes.

Communication and Transparency

Effective communication is crucial in change management. You need to clearly articulate the benefits of the changes and the problems they aim to solve. People need to understand why the previous approach is no longer sufficient.

Transparency builds trust and ensures everyone is on the same page. Sharing meeting notes and data can help people understand the context and rationale.

Psychological Safety and Iterative Approach

Psychological safety is essential. People need to feel safe voicing concerns, asking questions, and even making mistakes. It's important to create an environment where failure is seen as a learning opportunity. An iterative approach—testing small changes before full implementation—can help mitigate change fatigue and promote continuous improvement.

At Pinger, I often introduced changes as experiments. Folks normally very resistant to change were more agreeable to trying something for a limited time or with a limited scope. We agreed to revisit the changes after a set time and see what worked and what didn’t before making them permanent.

Addressing Beliefs and Identity

Change often involves challenging existing beliefs and identities. Some people may have their identities tied to specific processes, making them resistant. It's critical to address these beliefs and show that change is necessary for growth and innovation.

Collaborative Approach and Individual Conversations

Implementing changes should be a collaborative effort. In larger organizations, it may not be feasible to help every individual directly through the change. Instead, work closely with managers and empower them to guide their teams. Understanding the challenges and beliefs of each team can help tailor the approach. Individual conversations with managers can provide valuable insights and address specific concerns.

If you have strong supporters for the change, encourage them to publicly show their support. Ideally, recruit supporters at all levels of the organization.

Change Management Frameworks

While I don’t have direct experience using these frameworks, here’s a quick look at some popular approaches to change management (courtesy of ChatGPT).

Kotter's 8-Step Process for Leading Change

Developed by John Kotter, this process provides a structured approach to implementing change within an organization. It focuses on creating urgency, building momentum, and embedding change into the organization’s culture. The eight steps are:

Create a Sense of Urgency: Highlight the importance of the change and the potential risks of not acting.
Build a Guiding Coalition: Form a group of influential leaders and stakeholders to support and drive the change.
Form a Strategic Vision and Initiatives: Develop a clear vision and strategy to guide the change effort.
Enlist a Volunteer Army: Engage employees across the organization to actively participate in the change process.
Enable Action by Removing Barriers: Identify and eliminate obstacles that could hinder progress.
Generate Short-Term Wins: Plan for and celebrate quick, small victories to maintain momentum.
Sustain Acceleration: Keep up the pace of change by constantly reviewing and improving strategies and practices.
Institute Change: Embed the new ways into the organization's culture to ensure long-term success.

Use Case: Ideal for large-scale organizational change that requires significant shifts in culture or processes. This model helps guide the entire organization through the transition—from recognizing the need for change and creating a sense of urgency to securing quick wins and, finally, embedding the new methodology into everyday practices.

ADKAR Model

The ADKAR Model is a goal-oriented change management model. It focuses on five key building blocks that an individual needs to achieve for a change to be successful:

Awareness: Understanding the need for change.
Desire: Having the motivation to participate and support the change.
Knowledge: Learning how to change, including new skills and behaviors.
Ability: Translating knowledge into action and developing the capability to implement change.
Reinforcement: Ensuring the change sticks through recognition, rewards, and ongoing support.

Use Case: Useful for managing individual change within an organization, ensuring people progress through each stage effectively.

Bridges' Transition Model

Created by William Bridges, this model focuses on the emotional and psychological transitions people go through during a change, rather than the change itself. It consists of three phases:

Endings: Acknowledge the losses that employees may feel due to the change and help them let go.
Neutral Zone: The interim period when the old is gone but the new isn’t fully operational. This is a time of uncertainty and confusion but also a chance for creativity.
New Beginnings: When people start to embrace the change, develop new identities, and feel comfortable with new ways of working.

Use Case: Helpful for managing the human side of change, focusing on emotions and personal transitions.

The Kubler-Ross Change Curve

Based on the five stages of grief, the Kubler-Ross Change Curve is a psychological model that describes the emotions individuals typically experience during change:

Denial: Initial shock or denial that change is happening.
Anger: Resistance and frustration at the change.
Bargaining: Attempts to negotiate or delay the change.
Depression: Realizing the inevitability of change may lead to a downturn in morale or productivity.
Acceptance: Gradual acceptance and adjustment to the change.

Use Case: Useful for understanding the emotional journey employees may go through during a change and for designing interventions to support them.

Conclusion

Change is necessary in any organization, and navigating it can be challenging. I’d love to hear about your experiences with change management. What strategies or frameworks have worked for you? How do you handle resistance to change in your team or organization? Please share your thoughts, stories, or questions in the comments below, and let’s learn from each other’s experiences!

QUALITY BOSS

Discussion about this post